Skip to content

Rename and rebrand repository to Codebirds - #845

Closed
NexaZenith wants to merge 1 commit into
CodebuffAI:mainfrom
NexaZenith:rename-to-codebirds
Closed

Rename and rebrand repository to Codebirds#845
NexaZenith wants to merge 1 commit into
CodebuffAI:mainfrom
NexaZenith:rename-to-codebirds

Conversation

@NexaZenith

Copy link
Copy Markdown
  • Renamed freebuff directory to codebirds
  • Updated all package names from @codebuff/* to @codebirds/*
  • Updated all imports and references from codebuff to codebirds
  • Renamed files containing codebuff in their names
  • Updated README.md and README.zh-CN.md with new branding
  • Updated environment variables from CODEBUFF_* to CODEBIRDS_*
  • Updated all documentation and configuration files

- Renamed freebuff directory to codebirds
- Updated all package names from @codebuff/* to @codebirds/*
- Updated all imports and references from codebuff to codebirds
- Renamed files containing codebuff in their names
- Updated README.md and README.zh-CN.md with new branding
- Updated environment variables from CODEBUFF_* to CODEBIRDS_*
- Updated all documentation and configuration files

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: ce10b6eeda

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread cli/src/app.tsx
import { Chat } from './chat'
import { ChatHistoryScreen } from './components/chat-history-screen'
import { FreebuffSupersededScreen } from './components/freebuff-superseded-screen'
import { FreebuffSupersededScreen } from './components/codebirds-superseded-screen'

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Rename files before pointing imports at codebirds paths

This import now points at cli/src/components/codebirds-superseded-screen.tsx, but that file does not exist in the tree; the file still present is freebuff-superseded-screen.tsx. The same rebrand pattern also changes nearby hook/component imports to use-codebirds-*/codebirds-* names while the source files remain use-freebuff-*/freebuff-*, so loading the CLI entrypoint fails module resolution before the TUI can start. Either rename the files or keep the imports on the existing paths.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

}): Promise<ignore.Ignore> {
const { fullDirPath, projectRoot, fs } = params

const ig = ignore.default()
const relativeDirPath = path.relative(projectRoot, fullDirPath)
const ignoreFiles = [
path.join(fullDirPath, '.gitignore'),
path.join(fullDirPath, '.codebuffignore'),
path.join(fullDirPath, '.codebirdsignore'),

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P2 Badge Keep honoring legacy .codebuffignore files

When users already have a .codebuffignore in their projects, this change silently stops reading it because the ignore loader now only checks .codebirdsignore and .manicodeignore. Those projects will start including files they explicitly excluded from Codebuff/Codebirds context, which can leak private or very large paths into file trees/prompts after upgrade; please include .codebuffignore as a legacy ignore file the same way .manicodeignore is still supported.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

@codebuff-team

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thanks for the effort, but this isn't something a PR can or should do unilaterally: renaming the project (directories, package names @codebuff/*@codebirds/*, env vars CODEBUFF_*CODEBIRDS_*, README branding, etc.) across 626 files is a product/organizational decision for the maintainers, not a community contribution.

Concretely, this PR:

  • Breaks every published @codebuff/* package reference and any user relying on CODEBUFF_* environment variables — this is a hard breaking change for existing users with no migration path, deprecation period, or compatibility shim.
  • Touches .codebuffignore removal, packages/*, and other paths that are explicitly out of scope for this mirror.
  • Contains zero functional/behavioral change — it's pure find-and-replace churn, which makes it very expensive to review (626 files) for zero benefit to the codebase's correctness or maintainability.
  • Renaming a project is inherently a branding/trademark/domain decision the maintainers control, not something to be decided by a first-time external contributor.

If you have a specific, narrow issue (e.g., a genuinely wrong file name, a broken doc link, a real bug), please open a small focused PR for that instead. This one has to be closed as out-of-scope/rebranding churn.

@codebuff-team codebuff-team added bot:triaged Classified by the community triage bot pr:rejected Not a change this project wants; closed with an explanation labels Aug 20, 2026
@codebuff-team

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Closing this per the review above. If you think that read is wrong, reply and a maintainer will take another look.

Closed automatically by the community triage bot. If this is wrong, reopen the issue or reply and a maintainer will take another look.

@codebuff-team codebuff-team added the bot:auto-closed Closed by the community triage bot; reopen if wrong label Aug 20, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

bot:auto-closed Closed by the community triage bot; reopen if wrong bot:triaged Classified by the community triage bot pr:rejected Not a change this project wants; closed with an explanation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants